The struggling against fascism begins with the struggling against Bolshevism (section VII) by Alfredo Bonnano

If one looks with critical eyes at the picture of Bolshevism provided by Lenin’s pamphlet, the following main points may be recognized as characteristics of Bolshevism:

1. Bolshevism is a nationalistic doctrine. Originally and essentially conceived to solve a national problem, it was later elevated to a theory and practice of international scope and to a general doctrine. Its nationalistic character comes to light also in its position on the struggle for national independence of suppressed nations.

2. Bolshevism is an authoritarian system. The peak of the social pyramid is the most important and determining point. Authority is realized in the all-powerful person. In the leader myth the bourgeois personality ideal celebrates its highest triumphs.

3. Organizationally, bolshevism is highly centralistic. The central committee has responsibility for all initiative, leadership, instruction, commands. As in the bourgeois State, the leading members of the organization play the role of the bourgeoisie; the sole role of the workers is to obey orders.

4. Bolshevism represents a militant power policy. Exclusively interested in political power, it is no different from the forms of rule in the traditional bourgeois sense. Even in the organization proper there is no self-determination by the members. The army serves the party as the great example of organization.

5. Bolshevism is dictatorship. Working with brute force and terroristic measures, it directs all its functions toward the suppression of all non-Bolshevik institutions and opinions. Its ‘dictatorship of the proletariat’ is the dictatorship of a bureaucracy or a single person.

6. Bolshevism is a mechanistic method. It aspires to automatic coordination, technically secured conformity and the most efficient totalitarianism as a goal of social order. The centralistically ‘planned’ economy consciously confuses technical-organizational problems with socioeconomic questions.

7. The social structure of bolshevism is of a bourgeois nature. It does not abolish the wage system and refuses proletarian self-determination over the products of labour. It remains therewith fundamentally within the class frame of the bourgeois social order. Capitalism is perpetuated.

8. Bolshevism is a revolutionary element only in the frame of the bourgeois revolution. Unable to realize the soviet system, it is thereby unable to transform essentially the structure of bourgeois society and its economy. It establishes not socialism but State capitalism.

9. Bolshevism is not a bridge leading eventually into the socialist society. Without the soviet system, without the total radical revolution of men and things, it cannot fulfill the most essential of all socialistic demands, which is to end the capitalist human-self alienation. It represents the last stage of bourgeois society and not the first step towards a new society.

These nine points represent an unbridgeable opposition between bolshevism and socialism. They demonstrate with all necessary clarity the bourgeois character of the Bolshevist movement and its close relationship to fascism. Nationalism, authoritarianism, centralism, leader dictatorship, power policies, terror-rule, mechanistic dynamics, and inability to socialize—all these essential characteristics of fascism existed in bolshevism and still do. Fascism is merely a copy of bolshevism. For this reason the struggle against the one must begin with the struggle against the other.

Why socialism isn’t “government doing things”

Socialism is not a government doing things. You probably already know the definition of socialism so I won’t go over it again, but I will say that this is just liberal bullshit. Now this myth has done some good for the socialist movement by humanising socialism and making it easier for actual socialist to do work. It has also made it easier for socialism itself to be visioned in a non cold war propaganda way. 

But never the less, it is far from the truth. By this definition having a police force or a military is socialism. Subsidies to companies, building nuclear warheads, building roads and other things that are usually associated with governments are socialist. This definition kind of makes socialism a broad, useless term that can describe any government action.  

Why socialism isn’t state monopoly capitalism

State monopoly capitalism or, state capitalism, is an economic system of which the means of production and distribution are controlled by the state and managed by a bureaucratic class. You must be thinking “this sounds like socialism”. Well, no. The only people who believe that this is socialism are the Leninist and other authoritarian brands of “socialism”. So to libertarian socialist, this is not socialism because socialism is workers control over the means of production and the means of distribution, not the party or a bureaucratic class. Socialist seek to abolish (or should seek to abolish) the idea of classes, including the ruling class. 

When it comes to state monopoly capitalism the way of organization still has it that the work place (where goods are produced) is still organized in the same way that if it were privatized. So in a sense, when it comes to the true difference between these systems is which elite controls the profits. 

Why socialism isn’t welfare statism

        Welfare statism (or social democracy) is when the government issues social policies that use tax revenue to pay for things that generally help working class people. You must be thinking “this sounds like a good thing, why would socialist be against it”. Good question, we are against welfare statism because it, in general, keeps the hierarchical social relations and has been used to generally  pacify working class movements. Welfare policies do indeed improved lives for some, but it isn’t enough. It is usually unstable and doesn’t fix the some of the economic issues, most social issues and  the overall distribution of power remains in a hierarchical fashion (meaning dominating social relations). Welfare statism still keeps the status quo in tack and the capitalist mode of production.